ideas - Chess Opening Lesson : Ideas in the French defence Advance variation, Part 2 of 2 (Chessworld.net)
Chess Opening Lesson : Ideas in the French defence Advance variation, Part 2 of 2 (Chessworld.net)
Related with: no related information and ideas
kingscrusher ideas
ideas from Entertainment
Opinion and rank of ideas: 5.0
Views: 9692
Duration (length): 08:16
Many interesting information: specially for you.
Discussion and opinion
Thank you KC - vedder758
great game! I like the French Defense, but it takes a long time to castle
kingside. It can be dangerous if you dont know what your doing. - Sharkbite82
excellent game and overview, I will have to look into the French some more! - T.J. Flanigan
could you make a tutorial video on how to use fritz 11 and chessbase? i
just got both of them and don't know what to do with them. - mrellisjr
Ha! "White, with two queens, resigned!" Quite a game. - ImposingSumo
The french is such a tough defense. I usually just do the exchange
variation. But I should look into the Nimzowitsch variation. And the french
some more. I have never seen such a high level game when the player with 2
queens resigns. - theoriginalanomaly
excellent in depth analysis, i never play the french defense but at last
ill know what to do in case i decide to one day - buffguy86
A really aesthetic game. I've recently been playing a lot of blitz on the
ICC and I find that playing blitz is very useful when it comes to
developing your opening repertoire, because you're able to experiment a lot
more with openings and your opponents will do the same. I bring this up,
because I've started playing the French and got some good results with it.
I like the fact that 1...e6 looks unassuming, but can lead to surprisingly
dynamic positions, often with both sides foregoing castling! - xXxWilliExXx
Good video. what do you think of rybka? i use chessmaster to analyze most
of my games. I think it blunders quite alot for example i played a game
against Josh 1600. And the computor blundered quite a lot, maybe you could
have a look at my game and see what you think. This game was a centre
counter, I have been pushing my pawn to e5 recently and gaining good
ground. I wonder do you use chessmaster or do you know how to highlight
squares or wheteher you can. Well let me know. Thanks crusher - Peter Ratcliffe
Computers are not able to make a risky moves. Moves that are necessary to
provide for winning chances. (Hoping for your oppenent to make a mistake).
Sometimes the Position is so complex even a computer cannot calculate all
the variations. - Kristofer Dagbjartsson
All your videos are great, kingscrusher, very instructive. What is that
song at the beginning called by the way? - Parralyzed
Im not 100% sure this is true, for eg. 4 a computor to drop its rating from
2600 to 1600 it must make some adjustments to its thinking lines. If you
watch my video BEATING CHESS COMPUTORS i play chessmaster 10th Josh
Waitskin age 8, The comp plays some terrible moves. specially the knight
sac + king side pawn play near the end. - Peter Ratcliffe
An excellent video. It kind of kicks me in the teeth as an advanced french
variation fanatic (with the white pieces), but still excellent. Thank you. - PAIEETRR NIKKOVITT
I have just gotten back into chess and very much enjoy playing the French
Defense Advance, as black. You do a really nice job of explaining the
subtleties of that position. I enjoyed it very much. - Ecocandle
exactly what i was going to say, i normally play the sicillian against e4 - hayeder
@turtlebuster82 RELAX! In the french, often a black king in the centre or
Kd7 "holds" the defence together. As white, i've lost umpteenth games
against my computer as i realise my army's attacking a wing that has NO
enemy king!. What makes it worse is that after a move like . .Kd7 it can
later suddenly play . .Kd6! and then . .Kd5! etc winning the ending. I've
learnt thru sheer pain the truth in the theoretical rule that "An active
king in the endgame is a little stronger than a knight!!" - PAIEETRR NIKKOVITT
It poses a good question what makes a 2600 player better than a 1600
player. Fewer mistakes/ blunders (short range and long range) can a
computor really make a successful long range blunder on purpose? Any
thoughts please let me know??? - Peter Ratcliffe